A company that begs for job seekers' favor just to have them join has no future.

Read the original article (in Japanese):

老舗企業に「なぜもっと大きい会社にならなかった？」就活生の質問がSNSで賛否…「会社は僕に何をしてくれるのか？」令和の“モンスター就活生”に採用担当者の嘆き | 集英社オンライン | ニュースを本気で噛み砕け


■ Introduction: A Fair Question vs. a Self-Centered One

"Why hasn’t your company grown bigger after 119 years in business?"

One student asked this during a job interview with a long-established manufacturer. While blunt, the question was rooted in curiosity about the company’s growth strategy—a fair, if poorly worded, inquiry.

But another student, interviewed by a different company, asked:

“What will the company do for me?”

Unlike the first, this statement was steeped in self-interest. It showed no understanding of the mutual obligations in employment. Rather than seeing themselves as a contributor, the student framed the job entirely as something to be received—a product to consume.

■ The Real Problem Lies with the Employers

What’s more alarming is that this student was actually hired. The recruiter explained, “His attitude wasn’t great, but we expect a wave of retirements, so we needed to secure people in their 20s.”

But let’s be clear: there is no logical connection between upcoming retirements and the need to hire only people in their 20s. If immediate capability is required, skilled professionals in their 30s or 40s would be a far better fit. Hiring based solely on age is not strategy—it’s desperation.

■ The Myth of Youth as a Hiring Asset

Companies often justify hiring young people with phrases like:

  • "They’ll stay longer"

  • "They’re easier to mold"

  • "They cost less"

But in reality:

  • Young employees quit quickly

  • Many resist learning or feedback

  • They complain about tasks being “boring” or “not fulfilling”

And when entitlement enters the workplace, it spreads—internally and externally.
Dissatisfaction leaks onto social media. Clients lose trust. Reputation erodes. One misguided hire can poison the culture and destroy years of brand-building.

■ Mid-Career Hires Offer More Stability and Loyalty

By contrast, mid-career candidates are often more grateful to be hired. They:

  • Understand workplace expectations

  • Have experienced competition and rejection

  • Possess stronger loyalty and ownership

They don’t ask, “What can I get?” They ask, “How can I contribute?”
And that mindset is what drives real, long-term value.

■ Hiring Is About Cultural Integrity, Not Headcount

Good hiring isn’t about numbers—it’s about people who fit and elevate the culture.
Hiring based on age alone or for appearances leads to common failures:

Typical Outcomes of Flawed Hiring:

  • Unqualified yet “young” employees are hired

  • Teams become afraid to provide feedback

  • Early resignations and internal disruption follow

  • Complaints go public, damaging your brand

■ Real Hiring Power Is Shown in Who You Turn Away

Strong companies know when to say no.
They reject:

  • Candidates with entitlement

  • Those lacking sincerity or respect

  • Anyone who asks only, “What will I get from this?”

If your company can’t make those judgments clearly and confidently, you are not hiring—you are gambling.

■ The Cost of Hiring the Wrong Person

Bad hires drive away good ones.
This “reverse selection” phenomenon leads to:

  • Top talent exiting early

  • Problematic hires staying and lowering the bar

  • A cycle of cultural decay and failed recruitment

If you welcome the wrong person, you invite long-term harm.

■ Recruitment Shapes the Future

Hiring is not just about who walks through the door—it’s about what happens after they enter.
You must ask:

  • Will this person strengthen our team?

  • Will they respect our clients and coworkers?

  • Will they embody our culture—or erode it?

Failing to consider these questions is an act of corporate negligence.

■ Conclusion: Companies That Bow to Entitlement Will Crumble

When a company hears, “What will you do for me?” and responds with, “We’ll hire you anyway because you’re young,” it signals surrender—not strategy.

This is how companies implode from within.

Recruitment is not about getting people in the door—it’s about ensuring the right ones stay and grow.
Lose sight of that truth, and your future won’t be built—it’ll collapse.

Read in Japanese↓

就活生のご機嫌を取って入社「してもらう」企業に未来など無い（2025.7.14）

Read more articles (in Japanese)↓

「推し活休暇」を真似るだけの企業は失敗する｜“思想”の人材戦略（2025.7.11）

 

コメント

コメントを投稿

このブログの人気の投稿

Why Aren’t Wages Rising in Japan?

イメージ
  Why Aren’t Wages Rising in Japan? — How the Labor Share Ratio and Retained Earnings Are Stalling Economic Growth Read the original article (in Japanese): 生産性3割アップも「増えない給料」　原因は「貯めこむ大企業」にあった | TBS NEWS DIG Chapter 1: The Illusion of Wage Growth Despite government announcements of a “historic wage increase,” most workers in Japan feel no real difference in their paychecks. The reality is that real wages have barely moved in 25 years , even though labor productivity has risen by roughly 30% during the same period. This growth rate exceeds that of major European economies like France and Germany. The popular narrative — “wages haven’t increased because productivity is low” — is no longer credible. The real question is this: Why are companies making more money, yet not paying workers more? Chapter 2: Record Corporate Profits, Yet No Pay Raises The most glaring figure is Japan’s retained earnings , also known as corporate savings or internal reserves. In 1998: approximately...
続きを読む

Proposing the Radical Idea of a “Tenure-Based Retirement System”

イメージ
Read the original article (in Japanese): 「もう長すぎた…」宇宙飛行士・野口聡一氏が57歳でJAXAを辞めた納得のワケ( ダイヤモンド・オンライン ) The Reality Behind the 45-Year Retirement Debate The ongoing public debate around the “45-year retirement” and early retirement plans in Japan was initially intended to encourage self-directed career development. Yet, many workers interpret these initiatives as thinly veiled attempts to push them out. As astronaut Soichi Noguchi has noted, Japan’s work culture tends to reward compliance over skill-building or career ownership. If we want to change that, we need structural reform—not just slogans. The Proposal: A Tenure-Based Retirement System A better alternative is the Tenure-Based Retirement System . Rather than setting a fixed age for retirement, the idea is to define an employee’s career cycle within a company by tenure—say, a 20-year maximum. Such a system allows for natural career reflection without age-based discrimination. More importantly, it promotes a mindset where workers are exp...
続きを読む

How “Incompetent Seniors” Drive Young Employees Away Through Broken OJT Structures

イメージ
 Read the original article (in Japanese): なぜ「OJT」ばかりの企業に若者は定着しないのか？　上司が部下育成を勘違いする理由 「うちはOJTで育てる」と胸を張る企業がある。OJTとはOn-the-Job Trainingの略で、現場で実務を通じて部 www.itmedia.co.jp Introduction: Is “We Train Through OJT” a Cop-Out? “We develop people through OJT”—how many times have we heard this in Japanese workplaces? On-the-Job Training (OJT) is originally meant to be a practical learning method where skills are honed through real work. Yet in practice, many companies abuse this term as a way to justify throwing new employees into unfamiliar tasks without guidance. This leads to frustration, underperformance, and ultimately, resignation. This article explores why such “OJT in name only” is problematic and what structural improvements companies must make—drawing comparisons to the foundational training methods found in sports and the arts. 1. Without Form, Growth Can’t Begin Karate, Baseball, and Art: Why Mastery Begins with Form Karate has kata. Baseball has standard stances and pitching mechani...
続きを読む