The term “organizational rejuvenation” is a benchmark that exposes incompetent executives.

Read the original article (in Japanese):

【従業員エンゲージメント】日本は世界最下位、米国は第2位、意外な第1位は？ | 戦略のデザイン | ダイヤモンド・オンライン

Prologue | Japan’s Productivity Crisis Is Not About “Systems” but About “Values.”

Few countries work as hard as Japan and reap so little in return.
People are diligent, work long hours, and carry a strong sense of responsibility—yet productivity sits at the bottom of the G7, wages have barely risen in 30 years, and global competitiveness keeps sliding.
Why does a nation that tries so hard produce so little?

Public discourse often blames “systems”: insufficient work-style reform, slow DX adoption, weak investment. These matter—but the real cause lies far deeper.

Japan’s productivity is being eroded by a cultural pathology, quietly embedded in the foundations of its society: age supremacy.
Age determines everything—promotion, career mobility, reemployment prospects, compensation. Experience and results come second.
This has turned Japan into a country that discards experience as if it were industrial waste.

GALLUP reports Japan’s employee engagement at 6%, one of the lowest in the world.
In a country where 94 out of 100 people are not working with enthusiasm, productivity cannot rise.

This column examines how Japan’s age-faith culture destroys productivity, contrasted with Germany and the United States—two nations that treat experience as an asset rather than a burden.

Chapter 1 | Japan’s Age Supremacy: A Cultural Curse That Governs All Decisions

In Japan, age—not ability—defines a person’s value.
Youth implies “potential,” while mid-career and senior workers are seen as “costs.” This crude value system permeates hiring, evaluation, placement, and retirement.

Why did Japan become a society that judges people by age?

The postwar legacy of seniority and lifetime employment expanded unchecked, creating a quasi-religious belief that “youth equals value” and “aging equals obsolescence.”
This belief, more than any system failure, is the primary force crushing Japan’s productivity.

Managerial mandatory retirement: A systematic purge of experience

At 55, managers are stripped of their roles solely because of age.
This is nothing less than mass disposal of accumulated wisdom, judgment, and tacit knowledge.
Companies lament “succession problems,” unaware that they are the ones dismantling succession.

Early retirement programs: Targeting the most experienced

Those with the deepest expertise are first to be pushed out.
Every early-exit round drains the organizational memory that productivity depends on.

The labor market nullifies ability after age 45

No matter the achievements, applicants are rejected on age alone.
Japan’s labor market shares the same age-faith ideology, leaving almost no alternative pathways.

The psychological cost: All generations lose engagement

Young workers see the fate of today’s middle-aged and can clearly imagine their own future.
The moment they realize “no matter how much I achieve, I will eventually be discarded,” long-term commitment collapses.
This produces short-term behaviors and defensive careers—rational responses to an irrational system.

Chapter 2 | How Age Supremacy Destroys Engagement Across All Generations

Engagement—how positively employees work and how much they want to contribute—is the heart of productivity.
It is not only about this quarter’s numbers; it is about how confidently people invest their next 10, 20, 50 years into building the company.

Japan’s engagement rate is 6%—a collective cardiac arrest.

Employee Engagement by Country (GALLUP)

Country	Engagement	Actively Disengaged	Notes
Japan	6%	24%	Among the lowest globally; burnout widespread
USA	~33%	~18%	High managerial engagement; productivity tied to leadership
Germany	~17%	~20%	Strong WLB, experience utilization

Japan’s collapse is not laziness. It is predictability:
Everyone knows that aging leads to exclusion. Therefore, no one can invest emotionally or strategically.

Young workers

They see what happens to their seniors:

managerial demotion
early retirement pressure
age-based rejection in the job market

Naturally, they disengage early.

Mid-career workers

Responsibilities increase while compensation stalls.
“Management as punishment” is widespread, and the countdown to becoming “expendable” is visible.

Senior workers

Those who contributed the most are discarded the fastest.
Nothing destroys morale more effectively than watching accumulated expertise declared worthless.

When every generation loses hope, national productivity collapses.
Japan is not “working hard without results”—it is destroying the foundation that turns effort into results.

Chapter 3 | The Core Structural Defect: Japan Systematically Destroys Experience

Experience is a compound asset—knowledge accumulated through years of trial and error.
In Japan, this national asset is dismantled annually.

Why experience does not accumulate

Managerial retirement purges expertise
Early retirement pushes out veterans
Age discrimination makes experience non-transferable

Where experience is not rewarded, people stop learning.
Where experience does not accumulate, value does not grow.

Japan is committing “experience suicide”

With large cohorts losing managerial roles at 55, continuity breaks.
Every year, organizations reset themselves, killing productivity gains.

Experience destruction impoverishes the entire economy

Countries that compound experience—Germany and the U.S.—naturally outperform.
Japan’s stagnation is simply the economic cost of discarding knowledge.

Chapter 4 | Germany: A Nation That Nationalizes and Monetizes Experience

Germany excels not because of heroic individual labor but because the system elevates experience.

Meister System

Converts experience into state-certified qualifications
Grants rights (teaching, opening a business) based on expertise
Makes experience liquid and transferable across society

Dual System

Skill transfer is structural, not personal.
Young workers learn systematically from the experienced—nothing is left to chance.

Mittelstand

70–80% of SMEs hire based on experience
Workers in their 50s and 60s are standard contributors
SMEs hold over 40% of Germany’s exports

Germany does not waste accumulated experience—it weaponizes it.

Chapter 5 | United States: Meritocracy + Legal Protection Create a Rational Talent Market

ADEA: Age discrimination is illegal

This single law reshapes the entire labor market.
In the U.S., 40s and 50s are peak value, not pre-retirement liabilities.

Experience increases market value

Mid-career hiring is competitive
Wages rise with expertise
Opportunities do not shrink with age

Strong managerial engagement

GALLUP shows 70% of team performance is determined by the manager.
U.S. managers maintain higher engagement than their Japanese counterparts, lifting entire teams.

Chapter 6 | Comparative Framework: Japan vs. Germany vs. the U.S.

Category	Japan	Germany	USA
Treatment of Experience	Discarded with age	Certified & institutionalized	Highly valued in market
Middle-aged Workers	Cost burden	Skilled core	Prime talent
Hiring Focus	Youth	Experience	Ability & results
Engagement	6%	~17%	~30%
Work Style	Long hours, pressure	17:00 exit, WLB	Flexible, merit-focused
Skill Transfer	Weak / ad hoc	Dual System	Market mobility
Productivity	Low	High (1.5× Japan)	Highest
Wage Trend	Stagnant	Steady growth	Performance-driven

What the comparison reveals

Countries that preserve experience grow; those that discard it stagnate.
Engagement is shaped by how a nation treats aging workers.
High-value industries require structured knowledge transfer.

Japan’s problem is not competence. It is values.

Final Chapter | Japan Will Never Raise Productivity Until It Abandons Its Irrational Age Faith

Japan’s age supremacy discards a national resource—experience—at an industrial scale.

Experience produces high-value products.
High-value output raises wages and competitiveness.
Japan does the opposite: it destroys experience, then wonders why productivity falls.

This is not a defense of outdated seniority systems.
It is a call for a value shift:

**From age-based judgment

to experience-, ability-, and results-based judgment.**

Japan already has the effort, the technology, and the human capability.
What it lacks is a rational value system.
Until Japan abandons age faith—a superstition masquerading as tradition—its productivity will remain trapped at the bottom.

Read in Japanese ↓（For Japanese learners!）↓

このブログを検索

CRIA Global – Japan Workplace Knowledge for All Workers