Don’t underestimate structure—but don’t treat it as absolute, either.

Prologue | Why “It’s Okay If the Finish Isn’t Perfect” Can Sound Risky

“There’s no need for it to be perfect—just finish it first.”
There is no doubt that this phrase has saved many people. When the pursuit of perfection causes paralysis and time keeps slipping away, these words serve as a powerful antidote to stagnation.

The phrase was coined by George Tokoro, and paired with his free-spirited way of life, it is often consumed in a context that celebrates being “unrestricted by form” or “action over preparation.”

However, when applied directly to the world of business, a sense of unease emerges. Business is not a form of personal expression; it is an activity that inevitably involves others—customers, business partners, organizations, and brands. As a result, the phrase is easily misinterpreted as meaning “don’t think,” “no preparation is necessary,” or “it’s fine to launch blindly.”

These interpretations are not what Tokoro intended. He has never neglected fundamentals. The experience he accumulated as an entertainer simply became his own unique framework, enabling rapid response.
What is dangerous is not the phrase itself, but the way it is used.

In this article, starting from the original discussion on comedy, we will examine:

the true role of frameworks as a foundation, and
why both neglecting and absolutizing them lead to failure.

Chapter 1 | Why Shimo-furi Myojo’s Success Looks Like a “Blind Leap”

When people see someone achieve success at a young age, they tend to reach for simple explanations: “They had talent,” “They had momentum,” or “They weren’t bound by conventions.” These labels, however, are merely stories applied after the result is known.

The youngest champions in M-1 Grand Prix history, Shimo-furi Myojo, are no exception. Soshina had been performing on stage as a solo comedian since middle school, while Seiya had been making audiences laugh from a very young age. Both competed in high school comedy contests. They were not sudden prodigies; they simply began the cycle of failing, adjusting, and retrying at an unusually early stage.

Likewise, Shinsuke Shimada, who created M-1 Grand Prix, has said he spent decades breaking down and analyzing comedy routines to uncover the principles behind jokes that consistently work. This was not intuition—it was the pursuit of reproducible success.

Chapter 2 | The Enormous Foundation Hidden Behind the Illusion of “Youth”

The same structure appears in sports. Ichiro Suzuki refined his game through relentless repetition from childhood. Lionel Messi and Takefusa Kubo were drilled in fundamentals within world-class youth development environments from an early age. Their play looks free and effortless, but that freedom rests on an extraordinarily high accumulated foundation.

In other words, much of what appears to be “jumping in blindly” is actually a challenge taken after a return point—a solid base—has been deeply ingrained in the body.

Systematizing this accumulated wisdom is what we call a framework. A framework is the distilled essence of predecessors’ trial and error, designed to raise the probability of success.

Chapter 3 | A Framework Is Not the Answer—but a Starting Point

The word “framework” often triggers negative reactions: it stifles individuality, restricts freedom, and kills creativity. The original article even points to examples where standardized comedy education drained performers of their uniqueness.

But the problem is not the framework itself—it is how it is handled.

A framework is not a rule to be obeyed blindly. It is a starting point you can always return to. When results falter or judgment becomes uncertain, people ultimately go back to the first framework ingrained in them. It functions as a coordinate system that prevents thinking from getting lost.

Chapter 4 | Freedom Gains Value Only When the Foundation Is High

Freedom does not mean doing whatever comes to mind. It is the ability to make informed choices.

Low-foundation freedom leads to erratic, ad hoc decisions. High-foundation freedom allows one to explain why they deviated from the framework, how far that deviation is acceptable, and where to return if things fail.

It is freedom backed by a realistic expectation of results. That is why the higher the foundation, the greater the value of freedom.

Chapter 5 | The Proper Place of “It’s Okay If the Finish Isn’t Perfect” in Business

In business, the correct interpretation is clear: prioritize completion over perfection.

Rough edges are fine. Awkwardness is fine. But this does not mean “unfinished is acceptable.”

At minimum, the outcome must:

deliver real value,
have no fatal flaws, and
be structured in a way that allows improvement.

Only then can it be called a “low-finish-quality completion.” In gaming terms, releasing something playable and then debugging it has meaning. That is fundamentally different from a blind launch.

Chapter 6 | Organizations That Kill Results in the Name of “Form”

In many workplaces, ideas are stalled or killed despite producing results, simply because they lack precedent, violate convention, or diverge from established forms. This is often referred to as precedent-based thinking, and it is one reason mid-career professionals are avoided in hiring.

Precedent protects order—but that order is not necessarily current. The moment a framework shifts from a tool that raises success probability to a basis for judgment, it becomes distorted.

If results are being sacrificed for the sake of form, then the framework itself needs adjustment.

Chapter 7 | Managing Frameworks in Organizational Development

Frameworks are indispensable tools for turning people into minimally functional contributors. Without them, individuals are effectively non-operational and may even hinder the team. Throwing people into the field without teaching frameworks is not development—it is abandonment.

That said, mastering a framework alone does not create immediate contributors. Only through cycles of practice, verification, and adjustment does real capability emerge.

In early-stage development, management must clearly allow framework-based execution. Expecting improvisation beyond manuals and instructions is unrealistic. Following the framework is not thoughtlessness; it is basic risk control.

If someone cannot progress beyond the framework, reassessing their role or placement becomes a managerial responsibility. Development is not about pulling everyone upward indefinitely. It is about building foundations, testing in practice, and drawing lines through evaluation. Seeing this process through is what constitutes honest management.

Conclusion | Do Not Disregard Frameworks—But Do Not Absolutize Them

Frameworks, as foundations, reliably raise the probability of success. But when treated as absolutes, they strip away individuality and innovation, becoming enemies of the business.

A framework is a place to return to, not a chain that binds.
Understanding this balance is what creates healthy teams and resilient businesses.

このブログを検索

CRIA Global – Japan Workplace Knowledge for All Workers